Android Enthusiasts Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for enthusiasts and power users of the Android operating system. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Cyanogenmod's wiki says to use

But this revision says to use

These files differ. My question is: which of them (or both?) is safe to use before flashing DangerSPL for the first time?

NB. The main difference between them seems to be that their META-INF/com/google/android/update-script files differ thus:


    assert getprop("ro.product.device") == "dream" || getprop("") == "dream" || getprop("ro.product.device") == "sapphire" || getprop("") == "sapphire"

    assert getprop("ro.product.device") == "dream" || getprop("") == "dream"
share|improve this question
Any radio v2 or greater should be safe, but no reason not to flash the latest - that is known to be safe. – Broam May 14 '12 at 18:43
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Those are the same radio. the file name is just different. notice the version number in both is: The first update-script was modified a bit so it supports both the dream (adp1/g1), and the magic (adp2). The OTA radio looks like it was specifically for the dream.

I, myself, would use the one that is for both the dream & magic, but really, it shouldn't matter.

share|improve this answer
The Dream & Magic/Sapphire are basically the same hardware as far as the radio is concerned. – Broam May 14 '12 at 18:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.