Android Enthusiasts Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for enthusiasts and power users of the Android operating system. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm thinking about making an app which will require Bluetooth to be available at all times. However, if this reduces battery charge life significantly, then that's kind of a show stopper. Can anyone give me a general idea about how much drain constant Bluetooth use will put on the battery?

share|improve this question
Discoverability is definitely the killer here on Bluetooth in terms of battery. – t0mm13b Aug 16 '12 at 16:13
Also related: Does allowing Bluetooth discovery consume more power? – Izzy Aug 17 '12 at 14:03

What drains... my special. Here some data samples, based on a Motorola Droid:

| Mode               | Energy   |
| Bluetooth receive  | 751 mW   |
| Bluetooth send     | 487 mW   |
| Bluetooth standby  |   2,8 mW |

So if you use BT quite regularly (e.g. to be able to immediately pick up a call with your headset), having it in standby doesn't hurt that much (Compare: 2G StandBy 11,6 mW, 3G StandBy 18,3 mW, Wifi StandBy 7,8 mW -- and, often mistaken: GPS StandBy 0,4 mW).

But if, on the other hand, you use BT once a week (or even less) -- heck, you can manually enable it then, there are enough "toggle switches" and widgets available.

share|improve this answer
Oops.. you and your styles.. :) again, tabular data.. keep it up. – Evil Angel Aug 16 '12 at 17:00
Yepp, will do :) Unfortunately we don't have a nicer way to format tables but using ASCII art... – Izzy Aug 16 '12 at 17:52
@SachinShekhar If you are interested in the full list: What can I do to increase battery life on my Android device? – Izzy Aug 17 '12 at 14:05

Constant use of Bluetooth will put quite a significant drain on the battery, even having it on is known to drain the battery.

share|improve this answer
It will certainly drain it faster than having it turned off. However, how fast will vary depending on the phone. – BBlake Oct 31 '10 at 12:29

It really depends on what you are using Bluetooth for. I have a Bluetooth watch (MBW-150) that I sync with my phone using OpenWatch and it affects my battery life minimally. All it does is sync the phone's time with my watch, vibrates on certain notifications/calls, and gives me control of my music player (play/stop/next/prev/volume). So I essentially have Bluetooth turned on all the time and haven't really seen a battery problem because of it.

share|improve this answer

I have a Samsung Galaxy S (Vibrant):

  • With Bluetooth & Sync turned on, but the Bluetooth not connected, I better have > 45% battery before I go to bed or else my phone will be dead by morning.

  • With Bluetooth & Sync turned off, I only use 1-2% battery overnight.

How much of that is Bluetooth and how much is Sync, I don't know. But the combination sure kicks the crap outta my phone.

share|improve this answer

On my Galaxy S3 even if I have bluetooth turned on but do not use it at all it still drains my battery 30% faster as opposed to if it was turned off!

share|improve this answer
Hello and welcome to Android Enthusiasts Lance! :) While your answer is valid, it would be great if you could provide some data from your experience ( if you have some time available you could screenshot the battery life screen on multiple runs with bluetooth turned off/on) :) – benjaminS Jun 1 at 8:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.