Timeline for Samsung Galaxy Note 3 SM-N9006: Chinese knockoff/clone or genuine phone?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2016 at 1:18 | comment | added | Andy Yan | Although it's been a while, I'd still question this: how did you end up geting the conclusion that it's indeed genuine? Just having that model and passing that test doesn't mean it's genuine - nowadays some clones even port full Samsung UI, including settings, etc., so it's possible that the debug menu is ported too. | |
| Mar 13, 2016 at 15:11 | history | edited | dantis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more research
|
| Jul 8, 2015 at 0:38 | history | edited | dantis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2015 at 0:35 | comment | added | dantis | @Vic There aren't any Note 3 variants that use MediaTek chips, or any flagship Galaxy device for that matter. See Bruno Vaz's answer. (And yes, I've read that report too.) | |
| Jul 7, 2015 at 7:56 | comment | added | Dude named Ben | Seems your information is out of date. It was reported that they would begin using MediaTek chips. Newer article here. Maybe it finally happened? | |
| Jul 7, 2015 at 7:50 | comment | added | Dude named Ben | I did the dialer test and it DID go into a debugging menu. So what do you make of that? | |
| Jul 7, 2015 at 5:00 | history | answered | dantis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |