Skip to main content
added 877 characters in body
Source Link
eldarerathis
  • 36.8k
  • 16
  • 145
  • 176

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

For a good comparison, open a web page on a Galaxy Nexus and zoom all the way out. The same page viewed on a 14" (or such) monitor with similar resolution would be no problem, but the text is nearly indecipherable on your phone.


From the standpoint of "how is this accomplished technically" - it largely depends on how an app is written. By default, Android will simply scale the interface on to the larger screen, which may or may not cause more data to be visible (consider a scrolling list, for example: more items would be visible on a larger screen). That's the most basic scenario.

It's also possible, however, for a developer to define entirely different layouts based upon screen size or density. Therefore, the layouts on a 7" device may be completely unrelated to the layouts on a 4" device or 10" device. This gives developers a lot of flexibility to create richer UIs for tablets (and other such devices) while keeping the phone UIs useable. This is covered in length on Android's developers site.

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

For a good comparison, open a web page on a Galaxy Nexus and zoom all the way out. The same page viewed on a 14" (or such) monitor with similar resolution would be no problem, but the text is nearly indecipherable on your phone.

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

For a good comparison, open a web page on a Galaxy Nexus and zoom all the way out. The same page viewed on a 14" (or such) monitor with similar resolution would be no problem, but the text is nearly indecipherable on your phone.


From the standpoint of "how is this accomplished technically" - it largely depends on how an app is written. By default, Android will simply scale the interface on to the larger screen, which may or may not cause more data to be visible (consider a scrolling list, for example: more items would be visible on a larger screen). That's the most basic scenario.

It's also possible, however, for a developer to define entirely different layouts based upon screen size or density. Therefore, the layouts on a 7" device may be completely unrelated to the layouts on a 4" device or 10" device. This gives developers a lot of flexibility to create richer UIs for tablets (and other such devices) while keeping the phone UIs useable. This is covered in length on Android's developers site.

Image isn't the best illustration since it'll vary by screen size itself
Source Link
eldarerathis
  • 36.8k
  • 16
  • 145
  • 176

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

For a good comparison, open a web page on a Galaxy Nexus and zoom all the way out. The same page viewed on a 14" (or such) monitor with similar resolution would be no problem, but the text is nearly indecipherable on your phone.

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

For a good comparison, open a web page on a Galaxy Nexus and zoom all the way out. The same page viewed on a 14" (or such) monitor with similar resolution would be no problem, but the text is nearly indecipherable on your phone.

deleted 605 characters in body; added 128 characters in body
Source Link
eldarerathis
  • 36.8k
  • 16
  • 145
  • 176

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen.

As an illustrative example, let's use the monitor sitting on my desk right now. This is a 1080p resolution, ~20" monitor that I use at work. I can read Making content usable and see everything perfectly fine.

Here's the a screenshot of my monitor scaledreadable requires you to an approximation ofuse up more pixels on a 4"smaller screen with the aspect ratio maintained:

enter image description here

I think it's pretty evident that the latter is completely unusable, even thoughbecause they have precisely the same resolution. Granted, the difference in screen sizes is much larger here, but the same concept appliesare more densely packed.

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen.

As an illustrative example, let's use the monitor sitting on my desk right now. This is a 1080p resolution, ~20" monitor that I use at work. I can read and see everything perfectly fine.

Here's the a screenshot of my monitor scaled to an approximation of a 4" screen with the aspect ratio maintained:

enter image description here

I think it's pretty evident that the latter is completely unusable, even though they have precisely the same resolution. Granted, the difference in screen sizes is much larger here, but the same concept applies.

Showing the same amount of content on a 4.6" screen would make it prohibitively small in most cases. You wouldn't be able to read it, so putting that much content on the screen just doesn't make sense. Resolution determines how many pixels you can display, but one pixel is not the same size on every screen. Making content usable and readable requires you to use up more pixels on a smaller screen because they are more densely packed.

Source Link
eldarerathis
  • 36.8k
  • 16
  • 145
  • 176
Loading