Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 25, 2013 at 9:09 comment added Dan Hulme @RobinHood I added a new second paragraph to make this clearer.
May 25, 2013 at 9:09 history edited Dan Hulme CC BY-SA 3.0
add extra paragraph because it evidently wasn't clear enough
May 25, 2013 at 5:50 comment added RobinHood If it doesn't use Internet then how like and comment work?
May 20, 2013 at 16:11 comment added Dan Hulme While we can all agree that fewer permissions looks better, there's no suggestion in that article that writing Facebook Home this way was a deliberate choice to make users feel better. That's a very strong claim to make with no evidence, especially on a site like this, which focuses on substantiable, objective facts, not opinions.
May 20, 2013 at 16:00 comment added Kezz @DanHulme I don't really want to start a massive discussion here but mainly from here. Engineering wise it would make more sense to allow the end user to install Facebook Home independently of Facebook. Also, as this article and some Google studies show, less permissions mean the user is more likely to feel 'safe' when installing an app.
May 20, 2013 at 12:49 comment added Dan Hulme @Kezz101 Do you have a source for your claim that it's meant to make users feel better? From an engineering point of view, it's the obvious way to write the app.
May 19, 2013 at 20:13 comment added Kezz Yes; I'd probably go to 95%. I think it is also worth adding that they do this to quash any paranoia about Facebook Home having loads of access to your device (which Facebook has anyway).
Apr 30, 2013 at 14:54 comment added Naveen So basically 90% of Home already exists in Facebook app?
Apr 30, 2013 at 14:48 vote accept Naveen
Apr 29, 2013 at 10:23 history edited Dan Hulme CC BY-SA 3.0
expand answer
Apr 29, 2013 at 10:08 history answered Dan Hulme CC BY-SA 3.0