1

I have two phones, an old Nexus 5 running Android 6 and my new-ish Pixel 2 running Android 9. I have only one sim card (Cricket). I can enable a hotspot on my Nexus but not my Pixel 2, which says "To enable, go to att.com/mywireless or dial 611". Obviously, I didn't expect to lose hotspot services when I upgraded.

From these observations, I infer that Android 9 (but not 6) enables carriers to implement policies regarding mobile hotspots. Is that correct? Is there a difference in behavior between Pixel 2 phones bought though a carrier and those bought directly from Google?

And, if Android does facilitate device limitations, does anyone have backstory about why Google enables policies that are counter to anti-net neutrality?

Excellent relevant background: How can phone companies detect tethering (incl. Wifi hotspot)

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

From these observations, I infer that Android 9 (but not 6) enables carriers to implement policies regarding mobile hotspots. Is that correct?

  1. Yes

Is there a difference in behavior between Pixel 2 phones bought though a carrier and those bought directly from Google ( Device Manufacturer )?

  1. Yes

If Android does facilitate device limitations, does anyone have backstory about why Google enables policies that are counter to anti-net neutrality?

  1. Yes

  1. Many Carriers wanted control over tethering so Android just did what was wanted in that aspect, some carriers wanted to charge extra for tethering and even offer tethering specific deals that allowed you to get all your devices online for the cost of a single connection, some carriers offered unlimited data connections with mobile internet, thinking that it would only be used for everyday things like YouTube and Facebook, not expecting people to run WiFi hotspots off of a single device and effectively give internet access to anyone in range for free... Theirs many reasons to restrict network sharing, for example... let's say you purchased a few WiFi boosters ( repeater's ) and boosted that small business up the roads Free WiFi to half the city, half the city would have free internet ( it's a far fetched idea, however still concerning for internet providers )

  2. Yes the difference is exactly as you stated.
    One device is directly from the manufacturer and most likely a world-wide edition, meaning more language support and network band support in some case's.
    However carrier released editions usually come prepackaged with all the providers software, these are usually limited to certain bands and require unlocking by the carrier to allow the other network bands... This includes any extra features they'd like to implement, like stopping WiFi hotspot and tethering.

  3. The story isn't much,
    Carriers got scared by the simplicity of sharing Internet access to people that haven't payed for Internet... While Android made a normal business decision to allow carrier's more control over their releases of the device.

It's all pretty straight forward and easily circumvented with additional software.

Improve this answer
2
  • Thanks for the terrific answer. I'm still confused by this question: Is the code that disables hotspots part of Android 9 itself or is it part of a vendor modification. If the latter, then a Pixel 2 from Google should support unauthorized hotspots, right?
    – Reece
    Nov 29, 2018 at 5:37
  • It shouldn't be part of Android, only a vendor modification to make it part of the system.
    – Empire of E
    Nov 29, 2018 at 5:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .