3

Cyanogenmod's wiki says to use dream_magic.radio-2.22.19.26i-signed.zip

But this revision says to use ota-radio-2_22_19_26I.zip

These files differ. My question is: which of them (or both?) is safe to use before flashing DangerSPL for the first time?

NB. The main difference between them seems to be that their META-INF/com/google/android/update-script files differ thus:

  • dream_magic.radio-2.22.19.26i-signed.zip:

    assert getprop("ro.product.device") == "dream" || getprop("ro.build.product") == "dream" || getprop("ro.product.device") == "sapphire" || getprop("ro.build.product") == "sapphire"
    
  • ota-radio-2_22_19_26I.zip:

    assert getprop("ro.product.device") == "dream" || getprop("ro.build.product") == "dream"
    
  • 1
    Any radio v2 or greater should be safe, but no reason not to flash the latest - that is known to be safe. – Broam May 14 '12 at 18:43
5

Those are the same radio. the file name is just different. notice the version number in both is: 2.22.19.26i. The first update-script was modified a bit so it supports both the dream (adp1/g1), and the magic (adp2). The OTA radio looks like it was specifically for the dream.

I, myself, would use the one that is for both the dream & magic, but really, it shouldn't matter.

  • 2
    The Dream & Magic/Sapphire are basically the same hardware as far as the radio is concerned. – Broam May 14 '12 at 18:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.