Is there a list of permissions with more detailed descriptions available? The standard ones doesn't feel good, and I don't trust developers who write that they need permission X only to do Y--if their app requires permission X, this app will be able to do anything permitted by X, not only Y.

For example READ_PHONE_STATE is described as "Allows read only access to phone state" -- but what is included in that phone state? Is it only connected/disconnected? Or maybe it includes phone number I am actually talking to?


I can't find a good complete list, but you can always search for the permission on developer.android.com. In the case of READ_PHONE_STATE, it does look like the phone number can be read.

  • I'm a programmer, so I'm OK with this. But it would be much easier if there was a explicit mapping: permission -> list of allowed calls...
    – liori
    Apr 13 '11 at 13:10
  • I agree. Maybe if I have time I'll search them all out and compile a list ... Apr 13 '11 at 13:13
  • I believe when you install an app it gives a sort of "lay mans" description of what the permission does.
    – Bryan Denny
    Apr 13 '11 at 13:50
  • @Bryan Denny: as I wrote, description of some permissions are too vague. For example, what is phone state, actually?
    – liori
    Apr 13 '11 at 14:59
  • 1
    @liori that's just the problem (and I know, this is what you are initially asking). The dev docs only link to this developer.android.com/intl/de/reference/android/… which is nothing more than the "lay man" description given. Doesn't say what functions use each permission (that would be nice). So there is no mapping. @Matthew's idea of searching for what uses it is about all we have to go on.
    – Bryan Denny
    Apr 13 '11 at 17:19

This blog post tries to explain permission: http://techpp.com/2010/07/30/android-apps-permissions-secure-private-data/

If you really need to know the specifics of each permissions, you can download and grep Android's source code (it's open source, after all). I think that's the best we can do for now.

  • This does look like a good text. But it doesn't mention the thing found by Matthew Read in the other answer. Thanks!
    – liori
    Apr 14 '11 at 16:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.